 |
| https://www.bt.dk/udland/meteorolog-har-gjort-foruroligende-opdagelse-det-er-kun-et-spoergsmaal-om-tid |
Det er kun et spørgsmål om tid, før to store gletschere 600 kilometer syd for Sydamerika smelter. Det mener den amerikanske meterolog Eric Holthaus.
********************************************************************************
Climate
Change/global warming is a Hoax
The idea and creation of the climate change/global warming
hoax has been the product of powerful families with evil aims of
controlling the world through domination of finance and food production.
They made a simple mistake within the climate model architecture
and this mistake changed the results obtained from the models completely. The
heat trapped by the increasing levels of carbon dioxide just reroutes to space
via water vapour. This whole category of feedbacks was omitted, which greatly
exaggerated the calculated sensitivity to carbon dioxide. This one
miscalculated fact was enough to skew the results so that they could be used to
support the lie of climate change.
The big scare over carbon dioxide and global warming was due to
a simple modelling error.
Dr David Evans checked the mapping of the architecture being
used by the current climate models and discovered that while the underlying
physics was correct, the climate scientists applied it wrongly. Two serious
architectural errors were discovered in the basic climate model.
These 2 errors in the architecture were then fixed. The original
model was run again and future warming due to carbon dioxide was found to be
only 10 or 20% of official estimates. The conventional climate models had been
set up to work in a way that amplified the surface warming effect of CO2.
The actual recorded temperatures agree with the new
results from the model fixed by Dr. Evans. So we can now be sure that the new
model architecture is correct. There is no global warming due to CO2.
The NOAA study (June 2014) suggests that global
warming is still going on because they massaged their data too. NOAA are
claiming that their data needed to be corrected in light of the fact that the
"Ships collecting temperatures did so first by gathering water either in
wooden buckets, in canvas buckets, by thermometers positioned near engine
intake valves, and later buoys—resulting in temperature measurements that
varied slightly by collection method and requiring correction."
This is obviously a flawed approach to understanding and working
with the figures collected because the problem NOAA have highlighted in the
methodology would have actually resulted in the recorded temperatures being
higher than reality and not lower as they are suggesting.
Obviously, NOAA have corrected the figures in the
wrong direction. Multiplying the mistake instead of rectifying it. Temperature
figures subjected to arbitrary corrections can never be trusted as showing
reality in any way.
