*********************************************************************************
 |
| 22087409 - doctor vaccinating child baby flu injection shot isolated on a white background |
5/9/17 UPDATE: This
groundbreaking study was immediately retracted for political reasons. Read our update here.
The move towards mandatory vaccination is no longer a
conspiracy theory. California Senate Bill 277 snapped families into a reality
where informed consent and health freedom do not apply.
Presently, the American people are facing 173 vaccine-related bills in 40
states. The language of many of the new bills
aims to increase tracking, target non-vaccinating families, force vaccine
schedules, and further persecute families who choose not to accept vaccines;
the private products of for-profit, legally protected pharmaceutical companies.
The corporate media and medical industries have thrown their full influence
behind Big Pharma’s transparent ‘safe and effective’ messaging. At the same
time, both industries are simultaneously censoring discussions around the
fraud, dangers, mounting injuries, and criminal behavior inherent within the
vaccine industry and those pushing for mandatory vaccination. A central point
of contention, and human rights violation, is the fact that historically, no
true study has been conducted between vaccinated versus unvaccinated
populations. However, such a study has now come to fruition.
The Study
Having worked on the study for 15 years, from its original
conception to completion, Dr. Anthony Mawson and his coauthors have now had
their work published in the Journal of Translational Science.The
study, titled, ‘Pilot comparative study on the
health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12- year-old U.S. children’.
[1] Since long-term health outcomes of the
current vaccination schedule haven’t been studied, Dr. Mawson and his coauthors
set out to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated
children across a broad range of health
outcomes. The study was designed as a cross-sectional survey of homeschooling
mothers on their vaccinated and unvaccinated biological children ages 6 to 12.
It included mothers of 666 children ranging from fully vaccinated, partially
vaccinated and unvaccinated. The mothers were asked to indicate on a list of
more than 40 acute and chronic illnesses all those for which her child or
children had received a diagnosis by a physician among other questions.
The Results
The vaccinated children were significantly more likely than the
unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with the following: allergic rhinitis,
other allergies, eczema/atopic dermatitis, a learning disability, autism spectrum disorder,
any neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) (i.e., learning disability, ADHD or ASD)
and chronic illness.
The following is a breakdown of the specific results for vaccinated
children:
·
Autism Spectrum
Disorder (ASD) was 4.7-fold
higher in vaccinated children
·
ADHD risk was 4.7-fold higher
·
Learning disability
risk was 3.7-fold
higher
·
Vaccinated children in
the study were 3.7
times more likely to have been diagnosed with some kind of
(NDD).
·
Preterm birth and
vaccination was associated with 6.6-fold
increased odds of NDD
Vaccinated children were also significantly more likely to be
diagnosed with an immune-related disorder. The risk of allergic rhinitis
(commonly known as hay fever) was over 30 times higher in vaccinated children,
while the risk of other allergies was increased 3.9 fold and the eczema risk
was increased 2.4 fold.
The Conclusion
Given the current global climate as described in this article’s
introduction, the study highlighted three extremely noteworthy conclusions as
follows:
·
“…the strength and consistency of
the findings, the apparent “dose-response” relationship between vaccination
status and several forms of chronic illness, and the significant association
between vaccination and NDDs all support the possibility that some aspect of
the current vaccination program could be contributing to risks of childhood
morbidity.”
·
“Vaccination also remained
significantly associated with neurodevelopmental disorders after controlling
for other factors…”
·
“…preterm birth coupled with
vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the odds of
neurodevelopmental disorder above that of vaccination alone.”
While all three conclusions should be, and are, resonating
deeply within the masses of health professionals and parents, the study’s third
conclusion is especially timely and relevant beyond its stated assertion. Over
the last year, numerous medical whistleblowers
and scientific research papers have warned and demonstrated that routine
vaccine injury to preterm infants in hospital neonatal intensive care units
(NICU) is occurring. Whistleblower nurses Michelle Rowton James
and Joanne
[last name unavailable] publicly spotlighted how inhuman and commonplace NICU
vaccine injury have rooted in the culture of establishment medicine. While
three major studies [2],[3],[4] have corroborated the nurse’s
whistleblowing admissions. Meanwhile, in April 2017 The Institute for Pure and
Applied Knowledge (IPAK) released a statement
asking for all Americans to join them in their call for a ban on vaccination of
infants in the NICU. Speaking on the call to action Dr. James Lyons-Weiler,
PhD, CEO, and Director of IPAK, stated:
“We’ve
asked the biomedical community to produce studies that show ill effect of
vaccines on neonates, and they have not produced them.”
There is currently a clash happening between religious-like vaccine dogma
and increasingly aware segments of the public, research, and medical
communities. In the balance hangs the opportunity for a truly open discussion
on vaccines and a rare chance to reform a pharmaceutically-dominated medical
community that has lost its way. Giving the current trend, the consequences of
not seizing the opportunity for open dialogue appears to lead down a road of
mandatory medicine and censorship of exponentially mounting human injury and
mortality. Put simply, the battle now rages between openness and transparency
versus the protection, through omission and overt censorship, of Big Pharma’s
business model and need for ever-expanding bottom lines at all costs.
REFERENCES:
[1] Anthony R Mawson, Brian D Ray, Azad R Bhuiyan, Binu Jacob
(2017) Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6-
to 12- year old U.S children, Journal
of Translational Science, DOI: 10.15761/JTS.1000186
[2] Sen S, Cloete Y, Hassan K, Buss P (2001) Adverse events
following vaccination in premature infants,
Acta Paediatrica, Aug;90(8):916-20.
[3] J Bonhoeffer, C‐A Siegrist, and P T Heath (2006), Immunisation of premature
infants, Archives of
Disease in Childhood, Nov; 91(11): 929–935. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2005.086306
[4] Stephen D. DeMeo, Sudha R. Raman, Christoph P. Hornik,
Catherine C. Wilson, Reese Clark, and P. Brian Smith, (2015), Adverse Events
After Routine Immunization of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants, JAMA Pediatrics, 2015 Aug 1;
169(8): 740–745. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0418
Jefferey Jaxen is a researcher, independent investigative
journalist, writer and voice for health freedom on the front lines of society's
shift towards higher consciousness. Visit his website here to learn more.
