Zika vaccine:
watch out---it will alter your DNA
Explosive
details
By Jon
Rappoport
First, I'll lay
out a little background---
In many
previous articles, I've established there is no convincing evidence the Zika
virus causes the birth defect called microcephaly.
Basically,
Brazilian researchers, in the heart of the purported "microcephaly
epidemic," decided to stop their own investigation and simply assert
Zika was the culprit. At that point, they claimed that, out of 854 cases of
microcephaly, only 97 showed "some relationship" to Zika.
You need to
understand that these figures actually show evidence AGAINST Zika. When
researchers are trying to find the cause of a condition, they should be able
to establish, as a first step, that the cause is present in all cases (or
certainly an overwhelming percentage).
This never
happened. The correlation between the presence of Zika and microcephaly was
very, very weak.
As a second
vital step, researchers should be able to show that the causative virus is,
in every case, present in large amounts in the body. Otherwise, there is not
enough of it to create harm. MERE PRESENCE OF THE VIRUS IS NOT ENOUGH. With
Zika, proof it was present in microcephaly-babies in large amounts has never
been shown.
But researchers
pressed on. A touted study in the New England Journal of Medicine claimed
Zika infected brain cells in the lab. IRRELEVANT. Cells in labs are not human
beings. The study also stated that Zika infected baby mice. IRRELEVANT. Mice
are not humans. And these mice in the lab had been specially altered or bred
to be "vulnerable to Zika." USELESS AND IRRELEVANT.
All this fraud
set the stage for the Zika vaccine. Yes, it is under development. It is, in
fact, an example of the next generation of vaccines. And this is why you
should watch out.
Here is an
excerpt from a US National Institutes of Health press release (8/3/16):
"The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part
of the National Institutes of Health, has launched a clinical trial of a
vaccine candidate intended to prevent Zika virus infection."
"Scientists
at NIAID's Vaccine Research Center (VRC) developed the investigational
vaccine - called the NIAID Zika virus investigational DNA vaccine - earlier
this year."
"The
investigational Zika vaccine includes a small, circular piece of DNA - called
a plasmid - that scientists engineered to contain genes that code for
proteins of the Zika virus. When the vaccine is injected into the arm muscle,
cells [in the person's body] read the genes and make Zika virus proteins,
which self-assemble into virus-like particles. The body mounts an immune
response to these particles, including neutralizing antibodies and T cells.
DNA vaccines do not contain infectious material - so they cannot cause a
vaccinated individual to become infected with Zika - and have been shown to
be safe in previous clinical trials for other diseases."
SYNTHESIZED
GENES ARE INJECTED INTO THE BODY.
That's why it's
called a DNA vaccine.
Beginning to
wonder what this is all about?
It's about
PERMANENTLY ALTERING YOUR DNA.
It's about
altering the DNA of every person on the planet who is vaccinated.
New York Times,
3/9/15, "Protection Without a Vaccine." The article describes the
frontier of research. Here are key quotes that illustrate the use of
synthetic genes to "protect against disease," while changing the
genetic makeup of humans. This is not science fiction:
"By
delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys,
the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist
disease."
"'The
sky's the limit,' said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead
author of the new study."
"The first
human trial based on this strategy - called immunoprophylaxis by gene
transfer, or I.G.T. - is underway, and several new ones are planned."
[That was nearly two years ago.]
"I.G.T. is
altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of
gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies
against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes
are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle."
Here is the
punchline: "The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and
the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient's own DNA. If all goes
well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful
antibodies."
Read that
again: "the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient's own
DNA."
Alteration of
the human genetic makeup.
Not just a
"visit." Permanent residence. And once a person's DNA is changed,
doesn't it follow that he/she will pass on that change to the next generation
of children, and so on, down the line?
The Times
article taps Nobel laureate Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion:
"Still,
Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a
vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a
potentially fatal disease."
By now you
should be seeing the larger picture. A virus (Zika)...
Never proved to
cause anything...
Becomes the
occasion for developing and injecting a vaccine...
That is actually
a group of synthetic genes...
Which will
alter your DNA.
And that
program implies the possibility of a far wider operation:
Covertly, any
genes can be injected in the body and called vaccination. Untold numbers of
experiments to alter human DNA can be run. Experiments to create more
obedient and passive people, more intelligent and talented people, soldiers
who have much higher pain thresholds and who will accept orders without
thought or question...
And if you
think that is science fiction, read these words from biophysicist Gregory
Stock, former director of the program in Medicine, Technology, and Society at
the UCLA School of Medicine, to get a glimpse of what "the best and the
brightest" are considering:
"Even if
half the world's species were lost [during genetic experiments], enormous
diversity would still remain. When those in the distant future look back on
this period of history, they will likely see it not as the era when the
natural environment was impoverished, but as the age when a plethora of new
forms---some biological, some technological, some a combination of the
two---burst onto the scene. We best serve ourselves, as well as future
generations, by focusing on the short-term consequences of our actions rather
than our vague notions about the needs of the distant future."
Brave New
World? Yes, if Brave means Insane.
|