 |
| (SoTW - 22. juli avslørt - July 22nd revealed - still the best post from Nyhetsspeilet.no) |
Breivik Not a Solo Martyr Cell but Knights Templar Knighthood
... WEF'er Norway's Crown Prince Haakon without his 'criminal family' is commemorating the victims of the Breivik attacks opens up a permanent memorial service in Oslo with 'naive and unwilling' Norwegians and Gaute Skjervø. But the true scandal is daily Jewish life in Norway ...
... On that day, a 'far-right extremist' struck at the heart of Norwegian democracy they say; first in Oslo's Government Quarter, killing 8 with a car bomb in Oslo and murdering 69 people, mostly youth, at an Utøya summer camp (IAMA Utøya survivor on the payroll?) ...
Published on July 22, 2026 by Verdensalt
The 2011 Norway attacks generated massive global media coverage. However, controversy surrounds four high-resolution aerial photos of Utøya taken on July 21 - the day before the tragedy. The timing sparked speculation about whether the Associated Press was tipped off, further fueled by the agency airing live footage of a fake bomb explosion on July 22.
To be clear, the two or three unknown personnel wearing red berets as depicted above this text are neither Norwegian Special Forces (FSK) nor Military Police (IMHO) and on their military uniform had no visual insignias, name tapes, unit patches etc. (I was once trained as a MP K9 soldier at Denmark's RDAF).
The 35-minute figure is actually an understatement of the delay. An independent investigation (the Gjørv Report) found that police and special forces took much longer. Rumour has it, PST (the Norwegian Police Security Service), foreign intelligence services or Emergency Simulation Role-Players (Real Firms) issued a "stand down" order.
In the context, watch the TV series Nobel, were red-beret-wearing soldiers belong to the Norwegian Special Operations Command (Forsvarets Spesialkommando or FSK), who are depicted navigating complex geopolitical conspiracies involving foreign actors.
Who are these elusive figures emerging from the uncertainty? Moments after the explosion in the Oslo government quarter, security footage caught them picking up a wire, cable, or detonator on Grubbegata. Were these foreign agents disguised as Norwegian soldiers, or were they foreign crisis actors?
The suspects arrived in a white van with unrecognizable license plates. Who actually reported the incident, and why? Also, why did all of these men share the exact same description—about 170 cm tall, with dark hair and foreign accents?
The Norwegian government claims, in the real-world timeline, it was the Norwegian Military Intelligence Service (Etterretningstjenesten) and specialized local bomb disposal units that responded to Grubbegata, not foreign agents in disguise (they don't wear red berets).
The suspects arrived in a white van with unrecognizable license plates. Who actually reported the incident, and why? Also, why did all of these men share the exact same description—about 170 cm tall, with dark hair and foreign accents?
For a fictional story to be successful, it must be believable. Authors like MArk Twain, are "obliged to stick to possibilities" because readers demand internal logic, cause-and-effect, and narrative structure. If a fictional character makes a bizarre choice or an absurd coincidence happens, the audience will reject it as poor writing.
 |
| SoTW - today, airbase and NATO bnkers closed, FKO moved, nobody gives a shit abt the Airforce anymore |
 |
| Utøya: (Text and video evidence) |
.png)
.jpeg)