 |
| AKUT Cabaret, afleverede i 2013 underskrifter, manifest og en sang til daværende folketingsformand, Mogens Lykketoft på Christiansborg. (Foto: Torkil Adsersen/Scanpix 2013) |
 Explosive details: the Zika vaccine will alter your DNA |
|
Zika vaccine:
watch out---it will alter your DNA
Explosive
details
By Jon
Rappoport
First, I'll lay
out a little background---
In many
previous articles, I've established there is no convincing evidence the Zika
virus causes the birth defect called microcephaly.
Basically,
Brazilian researchers, in the heart of the purported "microcephaly
epidemic," decided to stop their own investigation and simply assert
Zika was the culprit. At that point, they claimed that, out of 854 cases of
microcephaly, only 97 showed "some relationship" to Zika.
You need to
understand that these figures actually show evidence AGAINST Zika. When
researchers are trying to find the cause of a condition, they should be able
to establish, as a first step, that the cause is present in all cases (or
certainly an overwhelming percentage).
This never
happened. The correlation between the presence of Zika and microcephaly was
very, very weak.
As a second
vital step, researchers should be able to show that the causative virus is,
in every case, present in large amounts in the body. Otherwise, there is not
enough of it to create harm. MERE PRESENCE OF THE VIRUS IS NOT ENOUGH. With
Zika, proof it was present in microcephaly-babies in large amounts has never
been shown.
But researchers
pressed on. A touted study in the New England Journal of Medicine claimed
Zika infected brain cells in the lab. IRRELEVANT. Cells in labs are not human
beings. The study also stated that Zika infected baby mice. IRRELEVANT. Mice
are not humans. And these mice in the lab had been specially altered or bred
to be "vulnerable to Zika." USELESS AND IRRELEVANT.
|
“When Montgomery came forward as a whistleblower to congressional intelligence committees and various other congressmen and senators, including Senator Charles Grassley, Chairman of the Senate
Judiciary Committee, who, like Comey, once had a reputation for integrity, he was “blown off;” no one wanted to even hear what he had to say,” the letter said.
“Under grants of immunity, which I obtained through Assistant U.S. Attorney Deborah Curtis, Montgomery produced the hard drives and later was interviewed under oath in a secure room at the FBI Field Office in the District of Columbia. There he laid out how persons like then-businessman Donald Trump were illegally spied upon by Clapper, Brennan, and the spy agencies of the Obama administration.
Montgomery left the NSA and CIA with 47 hard drives and over 600 million pages of information much of which is classified. He sought to come forward legally as a whistleblower to appropriate government entities, including congressional intelligence committees, to expose that the spy agencies were engaged for years in systematic illegal surveillance on prominent Americans, including the chief justice of the Supreme Court, other justices, 156 judges, prominent businessmen such as Donald Trump, and even yours truly. Working side by side with Obama’s former Director of National Intelligence (DIA), James Clapper, and Obama’s former Director of the CIA, John Brennan, Montgomery witnessed “up close and personal” this “Orwellian Big Brother” intrusion on privacy, likely for potential coercion, blackmail or other nefarious purposes.
He even claimed that these spy agencies had manipulated voting in Florida during the 2008 presidential election, which illegal tampering resulted in helping Obama to win the White House.”Allegations made by Montgomery claim that there was a, “systematic illegal surveillance on prominent Americans, including the chief justice of the Supreme Court, other justices, 156 judges, prominent businessmen such as Donald Trump.”....... [READ MORE]
Russia has successfully developed and implemented an alternative should it be excluded from international banking systems, according to a recent report.
As far as western sanctions go, by far Russia’s largest vulnerability is in its banking sector, which for better or for worse is tied to the hip with international banking.
If Russia wishes to maintain the status quo, there’s not much that can be done about this dependency. But shortly after sanctions were announced in 2014, Moscow set out to prepare for the worst-case scenario: being cut off from the Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) system.
In layman’s terms, SWIFT allows for fast and (allegedly) secure international financial transfers. In fifty years when you are able to use your Bank of America debit card on the Moon (for a low fee of 2,000 moon rubles), it will be because of SWIFT or a system similar to it.
There are two issues surrounding SWIFT “cut-off” for Russia: 1. Is it likely to happen? and 2. Is Russia prepared for it?
…cutting Russia from SWIFT would be a disaster.
According to Nowotny:
Such a move “we would see as very problematic because it could perhaps undermine confidence in this system,” the governor of Austria’s central bank told reporters… Of course, this hasn’t stopped Europe and Washington from threatening to pull the SWIFT plug.While it isn’t clear if this is going to happen, threats have been made since the beginning of the issues with Crimea and Ukraine.
“There were threats that we can be disconnected from SWIFT. We have finished working on our own payment system, and if something happens, all operations in SWIFT format will work inside the country. We have created an alternative,” Nabiullina said at a meeting with President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday.
She also added that 90 percent of ATMs in Russia are ready to accept the Mir payment system, a domestic version of Visa and MasterCard.
Izvestia daily reported that as of January 2016, 330 Russian banks had been connected to the SWIFT alternative, the system for transfer of financial messages (SPFS).
[…]
The central bank’s website says the system was established “as an alternative channel for interbank cooperation with the aim of ensuring the guaranteed and uninterrupted provision of services for the transmission of electronic messages on financial transactions.”
 |
| © Schöning / Getty Images |