Judaism's Kabbala explains that the Holy Serpent is the one who shall uplift the Jewish nation to godhood.
Texe Marrs was assistant professor of aerospace studies,
teaching American defense policy, strategic weapons systems, and related
subjects at the University of Texas at Austin for five years. He has
also taught international affairs, political science, and psychology for
two other universities. A graduate from Park College, Kansas City,
Missouri, he earned his Master’s degree at North Carolina State
University.
As a career USAF officer (now retired), Marrs commanded communications-electronics and engineering units. He holds a number of military decorations including the Vietnam Service Medal and Presidential Unit Citation, and has served in Germany, Italy, and throughout Asia. Marrs has written books for such major publishers as Simon & Schuster, John Wiley, Prentice Hall, McGraw-Hill, and Dow Jones-Irwin. His books have sold millions of copies. He is the author of books such as
Careers With Robots, Careers in Computers: The High-tech Job Guide, How to Prepare for the Armed Forces Test,
DNA Science and the Jewish Bloodline, etc.
Alexis: I am glad that you are approaching this
issue not from a metaphysically racial basis but from the point of view
of Rabbinic Judaism itself. Rabbinic Judaism, as we all know, provides
the foundation for the state of Israel itself and indeed for the
political ideology of movements such as Neoconservatism. This has been
documented in numerous scholarly studies.
[1]
So, we both agree that Rabbinic Judaism is a wicked ideology, and the “Jewish Utopia,”
[2]
as you put it, inexorably flows from that ideology. Other people over
the centuries have talked about this “Jewish Utopia” in one way or
another.
In a speech delivered at the B’nai B’rith in 1902, Solomon Ehrmann, a
Viennese Jew, envisioned a future in which “all of mankind will have
been jewified and joined in union with the B’nai B’rith.” When that
happens, “not only the B’nai B’rith but all of Judaism will have
fulfilled its task.”
[3] According to historian Albert S. Lindemann of the University of California, for Ehrmann, “Jewification equaled enlightenment.”
[4]
In similar vein, Baruch Levy, one of Karl Marx’s correspondents, declared that
“The Jewish people taken
collectively shall be its own Messias…In this new organization of
humanity, the sons of Israel now scattered over the whole surface of the
globe…shall everywhere become the ruling element without opposition…
“The government of the nations
forming the Universal or World-Republic shall all thus pass, without any
effort, into Jewish hands thanks to the victory of the
proletariat….Thus shall the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, that,
when the Messianic epoch shall have arrived, the Jews will control the
wealth of all the nations of the earth.”[5]
That’s obviously what the Rothschilds and Goldman Sachs are doing.
They are ripping people off through usury and covert activity. In fact,
Goldman Sachs executive director and head of the firm’s United States
equity derivatives business in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, Greg
Smith, left Goldman Sachs for this very reason. Smith wrote of the
company:
“What are three quick ways to become a leader? a) Execute on the
firm’s ‘axes,’ which is Goldman-speak for persuading your clients to
invest in the stocks or other products that we are trying to get rid of
because they are not seen as having a lot of potential profit. b) ‘Hunt
Elephants.’ In English: get your clients — some of whom are
sophisticated, and some of whom aren’t — to trade whatever will bring
the biggest profit to Goldman. Call me old-fashioned, but I don’t like
selling my clients a product that is wrong for them. c) Find yourself
sitting in a seat where your job is to trade any illiquid, opaque
product with a three-letter acronym.
“Today, many of these leaders display a Goldman Sachs culture
quotient of exactly zero percent. I attend derivatives sales meetings
where not one single minute is spent asking questions about how we can
help clients. It’s purely about how we can make the most possible money
off of them. If you were an alien from Mars and sat in on one of these
meetings, you would believe that a client’s success or progress was not
part of the thought process at all.
“It makes me ill how callously people talk about ripping their
clients off. Over the last 12 months I have seen five different managing
directors refer to their own clients as ‘muppets,’ sometimes over
internal e-mail…. the most common question I get from junior analysts
about derivatives is, ‘How much money did we make off the client?’ It
bothers me every time I hear it, because it is a clear reflection of
what they are observing from their leaders about the way they should
behave.”
[6]
