Judaism's Kabbala explains that the Holy Serpent is the one who shall uplift the Jewish nation to godhood.
…by Jonas E. Alexis and Texe Marrs
Texe Marrs was assistant professor of aerospace studies, teaching American defense policy, strategic weapons systems, and related subjects at the University of Texas at Austin for five years. He has also taught international affairs, political science, and psychology for two other universities. A graduate from Park College, Kansas City, Missouri, he earned his Master’s degree at North Carolina State University.
As a career USAF officer (now retired), Marrs commanded communications-electronics and engineering units. He holds a number of military decorations including the Vietnam Service Medal and Presidential Unit Citation, and has served in Germany, Italy, and throughout Asia. Marrs has written books for such major publishers as Simon & Schuster, John Wiley, Prentice Hall, McGraw-Hill, and Dow Jones-Irwin. His books have sold millions of copies. He is the author of books such as Careers With Robots, Careers in Computers: The High-tech Job Guide, How to Prepare for the Armed Forces Test, DNA Science and the Jewish Bloodline, etc.
Alexis: I am glad that you are approaching this issue not from a metaphysically racial basis but from the point of view of Rabbinic Judaism itself. Rabbinic Judaism, as we all know, provides the foundation for the state of Israel itself and indeed for the political ideology of movements such as Neoconservatism. This has been documented in numerous scholarly studies.[1]
So, we both agree that Rabbinic Judaism is a wicked ideology, and the “Jewish Utopia,”[2] as you put it, inexorably flows from that ideology. Other people over the centuries have talked about this “Jewish Utopia” in one way or another.
In a speech delivered at the B’nai B’rith in 1902, Solomon Ehrmann, a Viennese Jew, envisioned a future in which “all of mankind will have been jewified and joined in union with the B’nai B’rith.” When that happens, “not only the B’nai B’rith but all of Judaism will have fulfilled its task.”[3] According to historian Albert S. Lindemann of the University of California, for Ehrmann, “Jewification equaled enlightenment.”[4]
In similar vein, Baruch Levy, one of Karl Marx’s correspondents, declared that
“The Jewish people taken
collectively shall be its own Messias…In this new organization of
humanity, the sons of Israel now scattered over the whole surface of the
globe…shall everywhere become the ruling element without opposition…
“The government of the nations
forming the Universal or World-Republic shall all thus pass, without any
effort, into Jewish hands thanks to the victory of the
proletariat….Thus shall the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, that,
when the Messianic epoch shall have arrived, the Jews will control the
wealth of all the nations of the earth.”[5]
That’s obviously what the Rothschilds and Goldman Sachs are doing. They are ripping people off through usury and covert activity. In fact, Goldman Sachs executive director and head of the firm’s United States equity derivatives business in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, Greg Smith, left Goldman Sachs for this very reason. Smith wrote of the company:
“What are three quick ways to become a leader? a) Execute on the firm’s ‘axes,’ which is Goldman-speak for persuading your clients to invest in the stocks or other products that we are trying to get rid of because they are not seen as having a lot of potential profit. b) ‘Hunt Elephants.’ In English: get your clients — some of whom are sophisticated, and some of whom aren’t — to trade whatever will bring the biggest profit to Goldman. Call me old-fashioned, but I don’t like selling my clients a product that is wrong for them. c) Find yourself sitting in a seat where your job is to trade any illiquid, opaque product with a three-letter acronym.
“Today, many of these leaders display a Goldman Sachs culture quotient of exactly zero percent. I attend derivatives sales meetings where not one single minute is spent asking questions about how we can help clients. It’s purely about how we can make the most possible money off of them. If you were an alien from Mars and sat in on one of these meetings, you would believe that a client’s success or progress was not part of the thought process at all.
“It makes me ill how callously people talk about ripping their clients off. Over the last 12 months I have seen five different managing directors refer to their own clients as ‘muppets,’ sometimes over internal e-mail…. the most common question I get from junior analysts about derivatives is, ‘How much money did we make off the client?’ It bothers me every time I hear it, because it is a clear reflection of what they are observing from their leaders about the way they should behave.”[6]
