NATO Supreme Allied Commander Philip Breedlove recently took US hawks' campaign of Russia-baiting up a notch, suggesting Russia and Syria have 'deliberately weaponized' refugees to 'break European resolve'. The remarks, and the mainstream media's ability to convey them with a straight face, are an indication of a broken system, experts suggest.
Speaking to the Senate Armed Services Committee earlier this month, Breedlove said
that "together, Russia and the Assad regime are deliberately
weaponizing migration from Syria in an attempt to overwhelm European
structures and break European resolve."
Moreover,
the commander warned, criminals and terrorists have mixed in with the
refugees, and may now be planning attacks on the West; this too,
apparently, is Russia's fault.
Analyzing the general's remarks, and the Western mainstream media's ability to convince many of its readers and listeners that there is truth behind his words, some Russian commentators are simply at a loss for words.
Asked for comment, Alexander Shatilov, the dean of the faculty of sociology and political science at Moscow's Financial University, told the newspaper that this is a 'classical example' of using propaganda to reject even basic facts and logic.
"It's an open secret to everyone with any understanding of foreign policy that it is Washington that is behind the influx of refugees from North Africa and the Middle East to Europe. Firstly, in agreement with Turkey, the borders were opened. Secondly, American charitable organizations have been used to stimulate the flow of refugees to the Old World."
Breedlove's remarks, according to Shatilov, have several goals in mind, including "serving as one more reason to sculpt the 'enemy image' of [Russia] for the average European man in the street, and attempting to pressure Moscow, in order to get it to give up its support for Bashar al-Assad, or at least become more amenable to negotiations."
Asked whether Breedlove's comments and biased media coverage can really convince Europeans that Moscow is to blame for the migrant crisis, despite the fact that the crisis started months and even years before Russia's intervention in Syria, Shatilov suggested that unfortunately, the chances are good.
"Given the fact that the authorities of the major European countries are figures approved and vetted by Washington, the EU's leaders have done everything possible to cover for the 'American trace' to the refugee crisis."
"The Western media has long become very adept at shaping public opinion; combining informational and socio-cultural influences; it's possible, with time, to convince a majority to believe that Russia is to blame for Europe's migration problem. All the more so because many have not yet forgotten the old stereotypes about the Soviet Union, which many continue to associate our country with."
For his part, Vyacheslav Tetekin, a member of the Russian parliament's Defense Committee, said that while he has "great respect for the US military personnel as professionals…lately their officials have been speaking blatant nonsense."
"Take the war in Yugoslavia in the 90s," Tetekin noted. "For Europe, this war was completely unnecessary; but at this precisely this moment the Europeans were forming their common currency –the Euro. Washington helped to organize a local war to reduce the stability of the new currency."
In other words, "the current influx of refugees is but a new tool, which the US has not yet used against Europe. The EU is now facing serious economic, political and moral costs, while Washington can rub its hands in satisfaction; it's a slimy tactic."
Asked whether there is anything Russia can do to effectively counter the claim that it is to blame for all the world's ills, including the refugee crisis, Tetekin said that unfortunately, there is little to be done.
Analyzing the general's remarks, and the Western mainstream media's ability to convince many of its readers and listeners that there is truth behind his words, some Russian commentators are simply at a loss for words.
"Generally, we have long become accustomed to Western propaganda's capability to work long and hard to 'prove' that white is black and black is white," Svobodnaya Pressa journalist Alexei Verhoyantsev noted.
"But in this case the charges simply look ridiculous. Is it really possible this time to convince the so-called international community that 'Russia is to blame' for all the ills of the world?"
"It's an open secret to everyone with any understanding of foreign policy that it is Washington that is behind the influx of refugees from North Africa and the Middle East to Europe. Firstly, in agreement with Turkey, the borders were opened. Secondly, American charitable organizations have been used to stimulate the flow of refugees to the Old World."
"And all this began five years ago, when the US catalyzed the Arab Spring and, in Libya, openly overthrew the authoritarian but robust regime of Muammar Gaddafi. Therefore, more than anyone, Americans should blame themselves," that is – their own government's policies.
Breedlove's remarks, according to Shatilov, have several goals in mind, including "serving as one more reason to sculpt the 'enemy image' of [Russia] for the average European man in the street, and attempting to pressure Moscow, in order to get it to give up its support for Bashar al-Assad, or at least become more amenable to negotiations."
"Washington fears that with Russia's help, Assad may become the first Middle Eastern leader to successfully resist US pressure and to stay in power. This would mean a serious moral and political defeat. The last time something like this happened to the Americans occurred after the war in Vietnam, where they were forced to ignominiously withdraw, sinking their reputation in the world for many years afterward."
Asked whether Breedlove's comments and biased media coverage can really convince Europeans that Moscow is to blame for the migrant crisis, despite the fact that the crisis started months and even years before Russia's intervention in Syria, Shatilov suggested that unfortunately, the chances are good.
"Given the fact that the authorities of the major European countries are figures approved and vetted by Washington, the EU's leaders have done everything possible to cover for the 'American trace' to the refugee crisis."
"Earlier, Europeans were told that it was an uncontrolled process, and that they should pity migrants and help them adapt to their new homes. Today, an emphasis has shifted to the 'dark outsiders', in the form of Putin and Assad, who are pictured to be scheming against the continent."Today, the political scientist suggested, the "precise and well-crafted" tools of media manipulation make it possible to convince large numbers of people to believe in patent untruths.
"The Western media has long become very adept at shaping public opinion; combining informational and socio-cultural influences; it's possible, with time, to convince a majority to believe that Russia is to blame for Europe's migration problem. All the more so because many have not yet forgotten the old stereotypes about the Soviet Union, which many continue to associate our country with."
For his part, Vyacheslav Tetekin, a member of the Russian parliament's Defense Committee, said that while he has "great respect for the US military personnel as professionals…lately their officials have been speaking blatant nonsense."
"If they wanted to shift the blame for the flow of refugees to Europe on someone else's shoulders, they could at least have come up with something more intelligent," the lawmaker noted."It's obvious that Washington is behind the migration flows to the Europe — it is their strategy to weaken Europe to some extent. The US and the EU are geopolitical allies, but in economic terms they are sharp competitors. Washington does not want to see Europe feel itself to be self-sufficient."
"Take the war in Yugoslavia in the 90s," Tetekin noted. "For Europe, this war was completely unnecessary; but at this precisely this moment the Europeans were forming their common currency –the Euro. Washington helped to organize a local war to reduce the stability of the new currency."
In other words, "the current influx of refugees is but a new tool, which the US has not yet used against Europe. The EU is now facing serious economic, political and moral costs, while Washington can rub its hands in satisfaction; it's a slimy tactic."
Asked whether there is anything Russia can do to effectively counter the claim that it is to blame for all the world's ills, including the refugee crisis, Tetekin said that unfortunately, there is little to be done.
"Unfortunately, contemporary informational techniques have led to a situation where even intelligent people can be made to believe all sorts of nonsense. It is unlikely that Russia will be able to 'dismantle' this powerful Western informational machine; our task, instead, must be not to pay too much attention to this type of slander, to continue our work, and defend our national interests, including in Syria," Tetekin concluded.Read more: http://sputniknews.com/politics/20160313/1036217545/weaponized-refugees-commentary-breedlove.html#ixzz42oPa9mOa